Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Hatching-Box: Automated in situ monitoring of Drosophila melanogaster development in standard rearing vials.

Julian Bigge, Maite Ogueta, Luis Garcia, Benjamin Risse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian BiggeInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-3032-5121
Maite OguetaInstitute of Neuro- and Behavioral Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-8317
Luis GarciaInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin RisseInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5691-4029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we propose the Hatching-Box, a novel in situ imaging and analysis system to automatically monitor and quantify the developmental behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in standard rearing vials and during regular rearing routines, reducing the need for explicit experiments.This is achieved by combining custom tailored imaging hardware with dedicated detection and tracking algorithms, enabling the quantification of larvae, filled/empty pupae and flies over multiple days. Given the affordable and reproducible design of the Hatching-Box in combination with our generic client/server-based software, the system can easily be scaled to monitor an arbitrary amount of rearing vials simultaneously. We evaluated our system on a curated image dataset comprising nearly 416,000 annotated objects and performed several studies on real world experiments. We successfully reproduced results from well-established circadian experiments by comparing the eclosion periods of wild type flies to the clock mutants pershort, perlong and per0 without involvement of any manual labor. Furthermore we show, that the Hatching-Box is able to extract additional information about group behavior as well as population development and activity. These results not only demonstrate the applicability of our system for long-term experiments but also indicate its benefits for automated monitoring in the general cultivation process.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterAlgorithmsAnimalsAutomationBehavior, AnimalCircadian RhythmImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLarvaPupaSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41021616
PMCPMC12478940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.