ArticlePloS one2025
Dual S-methoprene and Lysinibacillus sphaericus larvicide use leads to multiple independent, and not cross-resistance in Culex pipiens.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Disconnect Between Operational Evaluations of Larvicide Treatments to Storm Sewer Catch Basins and Findings of Larvicide Resistance in the Northwest Suburbs of Chicago, IL, USA.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The potential of Clonostachys rosea as a biolarvicide against Anopheles gambiae.Journal of invertebrate pathology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
S-methoprene, an insect growth regulator, and Lysinibacillus sphaericus (Ls), an entomopathogenic bacterium, are important larvicides used to control Culex pipiens [L.] mosquitoes, the primary vector of West Nile virus, in the Chicago, IL USA region. Resistance to both agents has been documented globally including a report of resistance ratios greater than 100 to S-methoprene in the Chicago region. Laboratory studies have suggested the potential for unidirectional cross-resistance between S-methoprene and Ls, despite differing modes of action. Among wild populations of Cx. pipiens in the Chicago area, this study aimed 1) to assess resistance status to Ls, 2) confirm the presence of S-methoprene resistance ratios >100, 3) determine if higher S-methoprene resistance ratios are associated with higher Ls resistance ratios, or whether Ls resistance arises solely from Ls exposure, and (4) determine the relationship between Ls treatment history and resistance levels of that active ingredient. We assessed susceptibility to both S-methoprene and Ls in 32 Cx. pipiens populations: 19 with S-methoprene exposure but no Ls history, and 13 with multi-year exposure to both larvicide active ingredients. Ls susceptibility was evaluated using dose-response bioassays to estimate LC50, LC90, and resistance ratios. Susceptibility to S-methoprene was tested using diagnostic doses corresponding to resistance ratios of 10 and 100 at the LC50. Resistance ratios to S-methoprene exceeding 10 were detected in 30 of 32 sampled populations. Among the 13 sites with prior Ls exposure, 11 were observed with resistance ratios > 5. In contrast, none of the 19 populations without Ls exposure exhibited Ls resistance, despite exhibiting higher S-methoprene resistance ratios. This lack of overlap supports the conclusion that S-methoprene resistance does not confer cross-resistance to Ls in the studied region. Logistic regression revealed a strong association between Ls treatment history and resistance development. The probability of Ls resistance exceeded 80% after 10 Ls applications within an eight-year period. These findings emphasize the need to develop improved resistance management strategies for larvicidal insecticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.