Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Science teachers' mentoring support experiences when integrating technology in design-based learning STEM activities.

Esra Bozkurt Altan, Tuğra Karademir Coşkun, Nurhan Öztürk, Yasemin Hacıoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esra Bozkurt AltanScience Education, Faculty of Education, Sinop University, Sinop, Türkiye.
Tuğra Karademir CoşkunComputer Education, Faculty of Education, Sinop University, Sinop, Türkiye.
Nurhan ÖztürkScience Education, Faculty of Education, Sinop University, Sinop, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8624-3609
Yasemin HacıoğluScience Education, Faculty of Education, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the experiences of science teachers who applied the design-based learning (DBL) method in science lessons and received mentoring support towards technology integration were analyzed. Using a nested mixed design, the study included 43 science teachers who participated in a professional development program carried out with a mentoring model in a national project. In the study, face-to-face and online training were given to teachers, and mentoring was provided. Lesson plans and technology integration were evaluated with an online form. It was observed that teachers mainly tried to integrate technology into DBL activities but not as a component of the design process. The teachers integrated technology when teaching DBL STEM activities by using new teaching methods that incorporated instructional technologies. They carried out the integration, especially in the stages of solution development, prototyping/testing, and communication. Teachers who believed that technology supported their professional development recommended improving professional development programs to help overcome the challenges of technology integration.

Indexed as

FacultyLearningMentoringScienceTechnologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleTeaching

Identifiers

PMID41021611
PMCPMC12478917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.