ArticlePloS one2025
A qualitative evaluation of a compassion-focused therapy group intervention for UK healthcare staff at an acute hospital trust.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap in Humanizing Oncology: A Pilot Study on the Feasibility and Acceptability of the CIPOMO School of Medical Humanities Training Protocol.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare staff can encounter empathy distress, burnout, and trauma, often responding with self-criticism rather than self-compassion, yet there remains limited evaluation of compassion-focused interventions for staff with mental health difficulties. This study qualitatively evaluated a compassion-focused therapy (CFT) group intervention offered to National Health System (NHS) staff with mental health difficulties and high self-criticism. A qualitative design using semi-structured interviews was used. Eight staff who attended a 12-week CFT group were interviewed about their experiences learning key CFT concepts, group-based learning, the intervention's impact on their well-being, and suggestions for improvement. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Participants found the group beneficial, emphasising the development of group safeness, which fostered connection and vulnerability through shared NHS and caregiver identities. CFT content was seen as highly relevant, addressing self-criticism, while helping participants label personal experiences and enhancing self-awareness. The group format fostered a shared understanding of human suffering, reduced feelings of isolation and widened participants' perspectives through interpersonal learning. Participants reported acquiring skills to support their well-being, with some noting overall emotional improvement. Challenges included emotionally triggering content, highlighting the need for tailored support. Suggestions included smaller group sizes, flexible content delivery to meet individual and group needs, and additional support such as one-on-one sessions or booster sessions. Protected time from work, more information about the group process, and clear expectations were recommended to enhance group safeness and reduce initial hesitation. Group-based CFT was described as acceptable and beneficial, offering preliminary evidence for its potential to support NHS staff with mental health difficulties and pervasive self-criticism. Larger, mixed-method evaluations are recommended to explore the intervention's broader impact and mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.