Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021576›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Accounting for human-nature linkages in area-based conservation monitoring through social-ecological indicator bundles.

Natalie C Ban, Mark H Carr, Emily M Rubidge, Anne Salomon, Joachim Claudet, Arielle Levine, Lindsay Aylesworth, Luisa Ramirez, Jenn M Burt, Mark Andrachuk and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accounting for human-nature linkages in area-based conservation monitoring through social-ecological indicator bundles.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Natalie C BanSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4682-2144
Mark H CarrDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Emily M RubidgeInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, North Saanich, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8997-1177
Anne SalomonSchool of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Joachim ClaudetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), PSL-EPHE-UPVD, CRIOBE, Maison de l'Océan, Paris, France.
Arielle LevineDepartment of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Lindsay AylesworthSouth Florida/Caribbean Inventory and Monitoring Network, National Park Service, Palmetto Bay, Florida, USA.
Luisa RamirezPolicy and Economy, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jenn M BurtNature United, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark AndrachukReConnect Consulting, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3427-1373
Natascia TamburelloESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rebecca MartoneOcean Decade Collaborative Center for the NE Pacific, Tula Foundation, Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada.
Anna SchuhbauerFisheries Economic Research Unit, The Institute for Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mairi MeehanSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-8893
Dana BakerSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Georgina G GurneyCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Nathan J BennettGlobal Science, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
David GillDuke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA.
Gerald SinghSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Stefan GelcichCenter of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) & Instituto Milenio en Socio-Ecologia Costera, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5976-9311
Avery MaloneyGreat Bear Sea MPA Network, Coastal First Nations - Great Bear Initiative Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Fiona BeatyGreat Bear Sea MPA Network, Coastal First Nations - Great Bear Initiative Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

EWR Steacie Award, Discovery grantFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNature UnitedNippon Foundation Oceans Nexus CenterQuadra Centre for Coastal DialogueSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaTula FoundationUniversity of Victoria Faculty of Social Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the coverage of area-based conservation increases across the globe, it is critical to improve understanding of the social and ecological outcomes of such measures and the pathways to their outcomes. A social-ecological systems approach to monitoring and evaluation is increasingly advocated; yet, applications remain scarce. We sought to facilitate operationalization of this approach through prioritization of indicators when resources are scarce and to improve capture of social-ecological interactions. We convened a working group of practitioners and academics to explore linked social and ecological interactions through a case study of marine protected areas (MPAs). We used causal models (implemented through causal loop diagrams) in participatory and future-oriented approaches to identify interactions among key nodes of the system that can be a focus of monitoring. These nodes and their interactions provided insight into linked indicators of key system components, for example, biomass, compliance, perceived legitimacy, catches, and perceived fairness. We called these indicator bundles. Indicator bundles can be applied to analyze causal modeling diagrams, identify essential elements to monitor, and inform analytical and reporting protocols. The bundles can also help identify key leverage points for adaptive management to improve outcomes of existing interventions. This approach can inform monitoring and evaluation and, ultimately, the design and adaptive management of conservation areas that maximize social and ecological benefits and minimize negative trade-offs.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansModels, Theoreticalarea‐based conservation measuresáreas marinas protegidasde conservación basada en el áreaindicator bundlesmarinemarine protected areasmarinomonitoreo y evaluaciónmonitoring and evaluationOECMspaquetes de indicadoressistemas socio‐ecológicossocial–ecological linkagessocial–ecological systemsvínculos socio‐ecológicos其他有效的区域保护措施(OECMs)基于区域的保护措施指标集合海洋海洋保护区监测与评估社会-生态系统社会-生态联系

Identifiers

PMID41021576
PMCPMC12658953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.