ArticlePloS one2025
Bilateral muscle compensation occurs with a unilateral rotator cuff tear: A modeling study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bimanual tasks are necessary for daily activities but become difficult to complete with a musculoskeletal disorder. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are a common musculoskeletal disorder. It is unclear how an unaffected contralateral limb compensates when performing bimanual tasks. This work used a computational model to examine the effects of a unilateral RCT on performance of loaded bimanual tasks. A bilateral upper limb model was developed in OpenSim (v3.3), then modified to represent 4 RCT severities ranging from no RCT to massive RCT. A shared load (13.3 N or 44.5 N) was added to the models to represent holding typical household and occupational objects. Three motions were used as inputs to the Computed Muscle Control algorithm: static postures at low and high arm positions, and a dynamic forward reach task. The point analysis tool was used to track the shared load position. Outcomes included muscle force normalized by peak isometric force and maximum hand position deviation relative to input kinematics. Quantitative trends were analyzed for each outcome. During static tasks, uninjured muscles on the injured side increased force contribution with increased external load and RCT severity. For the dynamic task, infraspinatus muscle force increased with the massive RCT severity on the unaffected side by 76% for the 13.3 N load and 91% for the 44.5 N load, indicating contralateral muscle compensation. Minimal deviation occurred for the position of the shared load during the low posture static and dynamic tasks. For the high posture static task there was an inferior (342 mm) position change toward the unaffected side (83 mm) with the massive RCT, 44.5 N load. The bilateral model developed here has provided insights into bilateral compensation with a unilateral RCT. This modeling tool can be used to enhance understanding of task performance in the context of rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.