ArticlePloS one2025
"Hills of Activity" as an effective method for mitigating ground surface vibration in sustainable residential development.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the vibration mitigation efficiency of a hill and a system of hills. The effects of obstacle height, slope inclination angle, the number of embankments used, and their shape on vibration reduction levels are analyzed. It has been observed that larger, flatter hills reduce the dominant vertical velocity component more effectively than smaller, steeper ones. Multiple rows of obstacles can be employed to improve vibration reduction. The effectiveness of the solution was examined for both low-frequency (20 Hz) and high-frequency (60 Hz) excitations. The vertical component of the velocity vector may be reduced to as low as 30% of its initial value due to the application of the hill(s) or row(s) of hills. The main advantage of the proposed solution, in the form of a convex soil obstacle, is that it reduces both vibrations and noise (factors that often co-occur). Moreover, the system of hills can also function as playgrounds, providing a recreational space for children. Classical concave barriers (such as commonly used open trenches) do not offer such benefits. The proposed solution aligns with an important research direction in sustainable residential development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.