ArticlePloS one2025
Sex differences in the association between visceral adiposity index and biological aging: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 1999-2018 with mediation by insulin resistance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAging poses challenges global health and social care systems, with obesity potentially being associated with this process. However, sex differences and the mediating mechanisms underlying this association remain poorly understood. This study investigated sex differences in the associations of visceral adiposity index (VAI) with biological aging (BA) assessed via the Klemera-Doubal method age (KDMAge) and the risk of KDMAge acceleration (KDMAgeAccel), and explored the mediating role of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).
methodsAccording to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018), weighted data from 19486 adults were analyzed cross-sectionally. VAI-BA associations were analyzed in the overall population and sex-specific subgroups using multivariable linear and logistic regressions, with nonlinear patterns explored via restricted cubic splines (RCSs) and threshold analyses. Mediation analyses quantified the mediating effects of HOMA-IR.
resultsVAI correlated positively with BA overall. However, females showed stronger associations than males for each 1-unit VAI increase with KDMAge elevation (βfemale = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.81-1.23; βmale = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.75) and KDMAgeAccel risk (ORfemale = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.17-1.28; ORmale = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13), with all associations remaining significant (P < 0.001). RCSs demonstrated nonlinear positive associations in all cohorts (Pnonlinear < 0.001). Threshold analyses identified that females exhibited a higher VAI threshold for the KDMAge association (3.52 vs. 2.60) despite comparable effect sizes, whereas similar VAI thresholds across sexes were associated with a greater KDMAgeAccel risk in females than in males (75% vs. 36%). HOMA-IR partially mediated VAI-BA associations, with a greater percentage in males than in females in both VAI-KDMAge (21.67% vs. 12.71%) and VAI-KDMAgeAccel risk (27.09% vs. 10.39%) relationships.
conclusionVAI showed a significant positive association with BA, with females demonstrating a stronger association strength and males showing a greater proportion of the association mediated through HOMA-IR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.