Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021230›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Naturalistic Tobacco Retail Exposure and Smoking Outcomes in Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes Daily.

Benjamin Muzekari, Nicole Cooper, Anthony Resnick, Alexandra M Paul, Omaya E Torres-Grillo, Mary E Andrews, Bradley Mattan, Christin Scholz, Darin Johnson, José Carreras-Tartak and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Benjamin MuzekariAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nicole CooperAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Anthony ResnickAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Alexandra M PaulAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Omaya E Torres-GrilloAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mary E AndrewsStony Brook University School of Communication and Journalism, Stony Brook, New York.
Bradley MattanAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Darin JohnsonSchool of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
José Carreras-TartakAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Melis E CakarNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles.
Susan HaoAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Emily ZhouDepartment of City and Regional Planning, Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Elizabeth BeardWharton AI & Analytics Initiative, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Steven MesquitiDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Farah SayedUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Michael A FichmanDepartment of City and Regional Planning, Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David M Lydon-StaleyAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ian J BarnettDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Andrew A StrasserAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Thomas R KirchnerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York.
Lisa HenriksenStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

UPENN TCORS: Tobacco Product Messaging in a Complex Communication EnvironmentP50CA179546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2017
$18.7M
Cancer prevention through neural and geospatial examination of tobacco marketing effects in smokersR01CA229305 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Emily Falk · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
Can neuroscience dramatically improve our ability to design health communicationsDP2DA035156 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FALK, EMILY · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA179546NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229305NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA035156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The tobacco industry spends more than $8 billion annually in the US on marketing at the point of sale. Exposure to tobacco retail has been associated with smoking outcomes, but substantially less is known about how objectively logged everyday tobacco retail exposure is associated with smoking outcomes. Objective: To assess preregistered hypotheses that individuals would report (1) greater craving and (2) more cigarettes smoked on days when their exposure to tobacco retail is higher than usual. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multimodal, within-person cohort study combined objectively logged geolocation tracking, public tobacco retail location records, and ecological momentary assessment data. Eligible participants recruited from the GeoSmoking Study were aged 21 to 65 years, smoked at least 5 cigarettes per day over the previous 6 months, owned a smartphone, and were a resident of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, or Delaware. Data were collected from May 25, 2022, to June 10, 2024. Exposure: Exposure to tobacco retail stores was assessed using mobility data matched with locations of tobacco retailers across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Main Outcomes and Measures: Daily mean craving and daily number of cigarettes smoked were computed using ecological momentary assessment. Results: A total of 273 participants were included in the final analyses (mean [SD] age, 42.5 [10.7] years; 151 women [55.3%]). Multilevel models revealed support for both preregistered hypotheses. On days when individuals had more tobacco retail exposure than their own average, they reported significantly higher levels of craving (b = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.07; t3457 = 2.72; P = .01) and smoking significantly more cigarettes (b = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.0002-0.01; t3469 = 2.05; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals who smoke cigarettes daily, exposure to tobacco retail in their everyday lives was associated with increases in craving and smoking. These findings highlight the importance of retail exposure and smoking outcomes, information that is critical for developing effective tobacco control interventions and lays the foundation for broader health research on environmental factors that shape health behaviors.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingCommerceTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsAdultAgedCohort StudiesCravingEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew JerseyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41021230
PMCPMC12481226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.