Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021227›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Short Social Media Videos as a Supplementary Educational Resource in Neuroanatomy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Bayan Alsaid, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Layla Mousa, Hossam Al-Mardini, Mhd Moanes Almaradni, Hisham Alhomsi, Dana Al-Masalma, Mohammad Bashar Izzat

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bayan AlsaidLaboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Ahmad Al-BitarFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Layla MousaFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Hossam Al-MardiniFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Mhd Moanes AlmaradniFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Hisham AlhomsiFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Dana Al-MasalmaFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Mohammad Bashar IzzatFaculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The integration of microlearning tools, such as short social media videos, into medical education may offer novel strategies to enhance student engagement and knowledge acquisition. However, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. Objective: To evaluate short-term academic performance and student engagement associated with short social media videos as a supplementary educational resource in a neuroanatomy course. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, during the 2024 to 2025 academic year. Third-year medical students who responded to an open invitation were enrolled and divided into an intervention group and a control group based on voluntary participation and access to the social media platform. Intervention: The intervention group engaged with 50 educational Instagram reels (each 90 seconds) over 2 months through a study-specific Instagram account. The control group continued traditional study methods without exposure to the videos. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included changes in neuroanatomy knowledge scores, measured by standardized preintervention and postintervention assessments. Secondary outcomes included student perceptions of the educational value and usability of the videos. Results: A total of 167 third-year medical students (84 men [50.3%]) were enrolled and divided into an intervention group (n = 84) and a control group (n = 83). Mean (SD) baseline assessment scores were 5.5 (2.8) of 20 in the intervention group and 5.5 (2.3) of 20 in the control group. Postintervention scores were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (mean [SD] score, 9.9 [2.1] of 20 vs 7.5 [2.4] of 20; P < .001). No significant differences were observed between the intervention group and the control group in final neuroanatomy examination scores (mean [SD] score, 17.2 [1.3] of 20 vs 16.5 [1.5] of 20; P = .09). Among intervention participants, 84.5% (71 of 84) reported that the videos were a beneficial supplement to traditional learning, although 27.4% (23 of 84) noted that the content delivery could feel monotonous. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, the use of short social media videos was associated with improved short-term academic performance and positive student engagement but not with long-term benefit. The sustained impact of short social media videos demands ongoing evaluation, evidence-based modifications, and a focus on balancing creativity with educational outcomes.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateNeuroanatomySocial MediaStudents, MedicalVideo RecordingAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41021227
PMCPMC12481223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.