ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
The effect of pediatric chest CT examinations on lens exposure: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of error between Monte Carlo simulations of pediatric lens dose outside the scan range and measured values obtained with a dosimeter. Two types of computed tomography (CT) equipment and three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms were used, each with a nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (nanoDot OSLD; Landauer, Inc., Glenwood, IL, USA) mounted on its left and right lenses. The scatter dose measurements obtained from the nanoDot were compared with those predicted by the particle and heavy ion transport code system, which served as a Monte Carlo simulation tool during pediatric chest CT examinations. The error rate between the mean measured dose and the simulated dose was within 1.5% for Aquilion Genesis and within 8.0% for Revolution. We evaluated the degree of error between Monte Carlo simulations of pediatric lens dose outside the scan range and measured values obtained with a dosimeter. The Monte Carlo simulations tended to underestimate the error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41021198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.