ArticleBotanical studies2025
From biophysical interaction to structural modeling: bi-terminal G and TGS domains drive rice OsYchF1-OsGAP1 complex formation.
Article in Botanical studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OsYchF1 belongs to the YchF subfamily in the Obg family of G proteins, and comprises a core G domain, an α-helical domain, and a TGS domain from the N-terminus to the C-terminus. The C2-domain Oryza sativa GTPase-activating protein (OsGAP1) binds to and accelerates the enzyme activity of OsYchF1. The OsYchF1–OsGAP1 module plays a pivotal role in the response of rice to environmental stress. Nonetheless, how OsYchF1 anchors OsGAP1 has remained elusive. Our results demonstrate that OsYchF1 interacts with OsGAP1 through its N-terminal G domain and C-terminal TGS domain, while the inserted helical domain imposes a steric hindrance, as shown by yeast two-hybrid and isothermal titration calorimetry assays. Also, we implemented the AlphaFold2 artificial intelligence system to predict the structure of the OsYchF1–OsGAP1 complex. However, AlphaFold2 could not capture these dynamic conformational changes, likely due to the weak (KD=102.6 ± 11.7 µM) and transient nature of the OsYchF1-OsGAP1 interaction, which is primarily driven by hydrophobic interactions. Unexpectedly, the protein-protein docking by a fully automated algorithm ClusPro accurately recapitulated both the experimental evidence for G/TGS domain-mediated binding and the known cluster regions on OsGAP1, whereas AlphaFold2 failed to align with these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.