ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Identification of prognostic biomarkers associated with T and melanoma cell subpopulations in melanoma through integrating machine learning and multiomics.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMelanoma is a highly lethal cancer with a poor prognosis. T-cells and melanoma cells play crucial role in shaping the tumor microenvironment, yet their role and impact on prognosis in melanoma is still unclear.
methodsWe analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data for melanoma (GSE200218 and GSE215121) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and gene expression data from GSE65904 and TCGA-Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM). We correlated cells with survival outcomes to identify cell subpopulations linked to melanoma prognosis using Scissor. Based on 108 prognostic genes, melanoma patients were stratified into two subgroups. A novel prognostic risk score (PRS) model was constructed using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from these subgroups.
resultsOur analysis revealed specific T-cell and melanoma subpopulations influencing melanoma prognosis, validated in an independent cohort. Notably, our study was the first to identify MITF + T-cell and M2-cell sub-populations associated with melanoma prognosis. Using 108 prognostic gene markers, we stratified TCGA-SKCM patients into two groups with distinct clinical outcomes, immune cell scores, and carcinogenic profiles. Additionally, we employed 72 machine-learning algorithm combinations to develop a consensus prognosis model based on 174 DEGs from the two prognosis-related subgroups. Ultimately, we created a novel PRS model using 11 genes, which demonstrated accurate prognostic predictive ability in the GSE65904 validation cohort.
conclusionsThis study identified MITF + T-cells and M2-cells as key factors in melanoma prognosis and developed a novel PRS model for accurate prediction. These findings could help guide clinical decision-making for melanoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.