ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025
Sequestration and the Extended Museum Specimen: Effects of Time and Preparation Methodology.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Molecular Potential and Interpretability of DNA in Historical Spirit Collection Media.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Billions of specimens are housed in museum collections, but only a fraction are used in research after accession. The chemical composition of museum specimens, such as the presence of plant secondary metabolites (PSMs), is a useful component of the extended museum specimen concept. However, most of the work investigating chemistry of museum specimens has focused on herbarium specimens and not insects, of which some species may sequester and retain plant secondary metabolites. Also, the preparation techniques involved in entomological collections vary substantially and may influence the ability to detect sequestered compounds. The present work uses two Euphydryas butterfly species, E. phaeton and E. anicia (Nymphalidae), that sequester one group of plant secondary metabolites, iridoid glycosides, to ask two questions about the detection of sequestered compounds in museum specimens: (1) Can sequestered iridoid glycosides be detected in insect museum specimens and if so, how far back in time can we detect them? and (2) Do the preparation techniques used on insect specimens impact sequestered iridoid glycoside content? We detected sequestered compounds in insect museum specimens dating back to 1933. We also found that freshly collected specimens had significantly higher amounts of stored defenses compared to all other treatments. This work highlights the potential for use of museum specimens in chemical ecology and informs collections interested in adding chemical content to their extended museum specimen data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.