ReviewCVIR endovascular2025
IR beyond the procedure: mastering patient and team management.
Review in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation and Virtual Reality as Training Modalities in Interventional Radiology: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Implementing a Trauma Hybrid Operating Room from an Interventional Radiology Perspective.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating a 5G smart first-aid care platform for streamlining prehospital care in acute cardio-cerebrovascular emergencies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventional Radiology (IR) has evolved far beyond its procedural roots, offering advanced treatments in oncology, vascular disease, and trauma. Its future, however, depends on deeper integration into clinical workflows, patient management, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Barriers such as limited participation in care teams, absence of outpatient consultation structures, and insufficient clinical training hinder IR's ability to fully own patient care, reducing visibility and delaying referrals. To reframe IR as a true clinical specialty, several actions are needed: expand integration through tumor boards, ward rounds, and follow-up clinics; strengthen patient-centered communication to support trust and informed consent; assume leadership roles to improve workflows, staffing, and institutional decision-making; reform training with broader clinical exposure, simulation, and standardized certification (e.g., EBIR); and establish structural consistency across departments to unify identity and foster collaboration. The future of IR lies in combining technical expertise with patient engagement, interdisciplinary cooperation, and clinical leadership-ensuring it becomes a central, not peripheral, force in modern healthcare. This review will explore the evolving role of interventional radiologists in patient management, with particular emphasis on their integration into hospital-based multidisciplinary teams. It will examine their participation in clinical decision-making, interprofessional communication, and strategies to enhance the visibility and recognition of IR among both patients and healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.