Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021101›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Robotic repair of off-midline abdominal wall hernias: a single institution consecutive case series.

Priti Dutta, Gina Kim, Nathan English, Tapasya Katta, Gurudatta Naik, Margaux Mustian, Britney Corey, Abhishek D Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robotic TAPP repair of lateral abdominal wall hernias: a multi-center experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priti DuttaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Gina KimDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-8653
Nathan EnglishDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Tapasya KattaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Gurudatta NaikDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Margaux MustianDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Britney CoreyDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Abhishek D ParmarDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South Boshell Diabetes Building #525, 35233 205.934.7315, Birmingham, AL, United States. aparmar@uabmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile off-midline hernias represent only a small percentage of abdominal wall defects, symptoms can be debilitating for the affected patients, and repair portends substantial operative challenges for the surgeon. There are no large-scale case series that describe outcomes with extraperitoneal repair using the robotic approach. The objective of this study was to describe our experience of patients undergoing robotic repair of off-midline hernias at a tertiary care medical center.

methodsThis study was a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective robotic repair of off-midline hernias from June 2019 to October 2024. All adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with a primary (no prior repair) or recurrent off-midline hernia were included. Patient demographics, preoperative clinical variables (smoking status, BMI, ASA score, co-morbidities, presence of pain, hernia type, history of prior hernia repair, type of prior flank operation, and dimensions of the hernia on CT scan), operative variables (perioperative regional pain blocks, operative approach, type and dimensions of mesh used), and postoperative outcomes (hospital length of stay (LOS), follow-up duration, hernia recurrences, and complications including wound occurrences and chronic pain defined as pain > 3 months postop) were abstracted from a prospectively maintained hernia database. Univariate analyses were used to measure and describe all covariates and outcomes.

resultsThere were 43 patients included in the study. Patients had an average age of 57.5 years and an average BMI of 32.8 kg/m2. 81% of the cohort identified as White race and 65% were female. 26% of the cohort had diabetes mellitus (average HbA1c 5.8), 7% had a smoking history, and 9% had COPD. Most hernias were incisional (51%) or traumatic (47%). Average hernia length and width were 8.0 ± 4.5 and 6.7 ± 2.7 cm. 98% had a clean wound classification. Fascial closure was performed in 86% of the cases and a mesh was placed in 98% of the cases. Average mesh length and width were 21.2 ± 5.9 and 21.1 ± 5.1 cm. There were 6 (14%) hybrid procedures, where the hernia was repaired via a combination of a robotic and open approach. Average hospital length of stay was 1.9 days and average follow up was 4.4 months. There were two (5%) recurrences. There were 15 (35%) postoperative complications. The most common complications were seroma (14%), hematoma (7%) and persistent pain > 3 months (5%). One patient (2%) developed an abscess, two patients (5%) had a nerve injury, and one patient (2%) had a postoperative small bowel obstruction.

conclusionRobotic off-midline hernia repair can be performed with minimal morbidity. Most common complication was postoperative seroma. Surgical outcomes were similar to existing literature on outcomes following open repair. Surgeons performing this repair should appropriately counsel their patients on the risks of pain and recurrence postoperatively.

Indexed as

Hernia, AbdominalHerniorrhaphyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAbdominal WallAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeExtraperitoneal repairFlank herniaOff-midline herniaOutcomesRobotic

Identifiers

PMID41021101
PMCPMC12479632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.