ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
Management of clinical stage T3/T4 bladder cancer: a review.
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBladder cancer is a common malignancy in the United States and while the majority are non-muscle invasive at diagnosis, those with muscle-invasive and locally advanced disease can be challenging to manage. In addition, the prognosis is poorer in this group with high rates of recurrence following treatment. Clinical trials and advances in systemic therapy have helped to improve outcomes for these patients. MATERIALS/
methodsArticles were chosen for inclusion based on expert knowledge of the literature and PubMed literature searches for the relevant areas, with a focus on clinical trials. Appropriate articles were selected for inclusion by reviewing article titles, abstracts and full texts.
resultsThe standard of care for treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. The NIAGARA trial recently changed the standard of care to include immunotherapy both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Multiple clinical trials have assessed the potential benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with high-risk disease after radical cystectomy, leading to the approval of nivolumab in this setting. Improvements in staging and surveillance of these patients are necessary. The use of circulating tumor DNA and advances in imaging have also shown promise in prognostication and detection and monitoring of recurrence.
conclusionsLocally advanced bladder cancer is a challenging condition to manage, and while advances have been made in systemic therapy and biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA, further investigation is needed to continue to improve outcomes for this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.