SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Machine learning for endoscopic third ventriculostomy success prediction-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recalibrating ETV prediction: a standards-first, decision-aware, and equity-oriented roadmap for pediatric hydrocephalus.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is a common treatment for pediatric obstructive hydrocephalus, but predicting its success remains challenging. Traditional predictive tools, such as the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) and logistic regression (LR) models, are widely used; however, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) have shown promise in improving prediction accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effectiveness of ML models in predicting ETV success and compare them to traditional models.
methodsA systematic search across five databases was performed. Authors searched for studies, which used ML algorithms to predict ETV success. This review included studies included studies that reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model performance. ETV success was considered the absence of ETV failure criteria in 6 months after procedure: either recurrence of hydrocephalus symptoms, repeated surgery, or mortality.
resultsA total of four studies involving 3087 pediatric patients were included. The overall pooled AUC for ML models was 0.63 (95% CI 0.56-0.70), with significant heterogeneity (I
conclusionsML models show moderate potential for predicting ETV success but do not outperform traditional tools like ETVSS and LR models in clinical application. High heterogeneity and methodological limitations suggest that further research is needed to optimize and validate ML algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.