ArticleRheumatology international2025
Scoping review of biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: evidence gaps and proposed outcome reporting framework.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical evidence and implementation guidance for biosimilar switching in ankylosing spondylitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have revolutionized the management of autoimmune diseases. Biosimilar DMARDs have emerged as highly similar, cost-efficient alternatives; however, the scope of their perinatal evidence remains unexplored. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize evidence on the impact of biosimilar DMARDs on pregnancy outcomes. We searched Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases in November 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria were studies examining biosimilar DMARD exposure for autoimmune diseases in mothers during pregnancy, fathers prior to conception and/or fetuses/neonates in-utero. Data were extracted on sample size, study design, drug exposure (timing, duration), and pregnancy outcomes. Patterns in methodologic reporting across studies were also analyzed. Overall, 6 studies (5 descriptive, 1 cohort study) were eligible for inclusion. Biosimilars examined were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (infliximab, n = 4; etanercept, n = 2; adalimumab, n = 1) and B-cell inhibitors (rituximab, n = 1) among 63 mothers with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. Twenty-four fetal/neonatal (i.e., congenital anomaly), fetal/neonatal-maternal (i.e., Caesarean-section, spontaneous abortion), and maternal (i.e., disease flare) outcomes were reported. For methodologic reporting, we observed inconsistencies in exposure and outcome measures. To enhance comparability and standardization, we encourage the use of our Reproductive Health Outcomes Reporting Framework. Our scoping review is the first synthesis of perinatal evidence to date on biosimilar DMARDs. Critical gaps include an overall limited number of studies and a lack of analytical research that evaluate associations between exposures and outcomes. These findings highlight key evidence gaps in understanding the perinatal impacts of these emerging drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.