Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021018›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Demonstrating voxel-by-voxel (V × V) single-point calibration in liver tissue by IR-MALDESI quantitative MSI.

Emily R Bruce, Russell R Kibbe, Logan J Opperman, David C Muddiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily R BruceBiological Imaging Laboratory for Disease and Exposure Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Russell R KibbeBiological Imaging Laboratory for Disease and Exposure Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Logan J OppermanDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
David C MuddimanBiological Imaging Laboratory for Disease and Exposure Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. dcmuddim@ncsu.edu.

Funding

Development and Application of New Ionization Methods for Biological Mass SpectrometryR01GM087964 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MUDDIMAN, DAVID C. · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute R01CA288969NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (qMSI) provides information regarding the colocalization, relative abundance, and concentration of a target analyte in a tissue without homogenization. Ionization sources, including IR-MALDESI, commonly utilize an on-tissue spatial calibration curve approach; however, this approach has several limitations including tedious sample preparation, and this approach does not account for local matrix effects. To compensate for these two limitations, we developed voxel-by-voxel (V × V) quantification to provide an internal standard calibration point for every voxel which requires a simple sample preparation and accounts for local matrix effects. In this work, we evaluate the performance of V × V quantification against the spatial calibration curve to assess the quantitative capacity of this newly developed method. Quantification of glutathione (GSH) on a per-voxel basis involves homogenously spraying a known amount of stable isotope-labeled glutathione (SIL-GSH) on a microscope slide. Next, we mount liver sections on top of the coated slides and image them using IR-MALDESI MSI. Statistical analysis demonstrated high precision for V × V quantification over a wide concentration range; however, the method's accuracy is currently limited due to the sprayer's configuration. Results support the feasibility of V × V quantification as evidenced by concentration heatmaps. Additionally, V × V quantification allows for parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) imaging which provides high specificity. Combined with relativity, straightforward sample preparation, and promising initial statistics, the V × V method offers significant advantages over spatial calibration curves.

Indexed as

GlutathioneLiverSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnimalsCalibrationMiceGlutathioneIR-MALDESIQuantitative mass spectrometry imagingQuantitative samplingSingle-point calibration

Identifiers

PMID41021018
PMCPMC12515498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.