ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Multilayered insights into the full spectrum of diffuse gliomas: a novel prognostic evaluation model.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe intrinsic heterogeneity and invasiveness of diffuse gliomas complicate accurate prognosis. Existing approaches are largely constrained by subtype specificity or limited analytical dimensions. To address this gap, a multi- dimension-based prognostic framework encompassing the full glioma spectrum was developed, accompanied by an analysis of the associated immune microenvironment.
methodsA total of 3,323 glioma samples from the SEER (n = 2181), CGGA (n = 807), and TCGA (n = 335) datasets were integrated. Differentially expressed genes were screened using the limma package, and a Lasso-Cox-based prognostic signature (Glioma-GDPM) was established. Clinical variables such as age, grade, and IDH mutation status were harmonized through propensity score matching to construct a multi-omics prognostic model (Glioma-GCDPM). GSEA, CIBERSORT-based immune infiltration analysis, and TIDE scoring were used to investigate the biological characteristics of different risk subgroups.
resultsEleven key prognostic genes (such as PRAMEF2 and FADS1) and four clinical factors (age, tumor grade, IDH mutation, and 1p/19q codeletion) were identified. Glioma-GCDPM demonstrated favorable predictive ability in both the internal test cohort (AUC 0.81-0.86) and external validation sets (AUC 0.59-0.83). High-risk tumors exhibited greater invasiveness, with significant enrichment in cell cycle and proliferation-associated pathways. Additionally, a suppressed immune microenvironment was observed, reflected by elevated M2 macrophage infiltration and increased T cell dysfunction scores.
conclusionThe multi-omics model established in this study enables precise stratification of prognostic risk in diffuse glioma patients and reveals immunosuppressive features in high-risk individuals, providing a new basis for personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.