ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Effects of repeated trials on the strategy used for a hand laterality judgment task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hand laterality judgment task requires participants to determine whether a picture of a hand, presented at various rotational angles, depicts a left or right hand. Several strategies have been suggested to be involved in task performance: in particular, palm-view pictures are thought to rely on motor imagery (MI), whereas back-view pictures are thought to rely on 'nonMI' (i.e., without motor imagery) strategies, including visual imagery (VI). However, the influence of repeated task execution on performance strategies remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between self-reported strategies and response time (RT) profiles during a 512-trial hand laterality judgment task in 42 healthy adults. Based on post-task self-reports for palm-view pictures, participants were classified into the MI group, consistently using MI throughout the trials, and the MI-nonMI group, switching from MI to nonMI during the repeated trials. In the MI group, RT profiles consistently showed longer RTs for lateral palm-view pictures (outward-pointing fingers) than for medial orientations (inward-pointing fingers), characteristic of MI use, across both halves of the task. The MI-nonMI group showed similar RT patterns initially, but in the second half, RT differences between lateral and medial orientations diminished, suggesting a shift toward VI-like characteristics. These findings suggest that although both groups may have used MI, RT trends varied according to the participants' self-reported strategies. In the MI group, both explicit self-report and implicit RT profiles indicated sustained MI use, whereas the MI-nonMI group, self-reports indicated a strategy shift to nonMI, and their RT profiles suggest a combined use of MI and nonMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.