ReviewEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2025
Optimizing Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Current Uses and Challenges.
Review in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Guided Pectoral Nerve Block for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Postprocedural Analgesic Benefit in an Asian Population.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Optimizing Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Current Uses and Challenges.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices are an effective treatment for heart rhythm disorders. Currently, x-ray imaging-especially fluoroscopy-is the standard method used to guide the implantation process and assess its effectiveness. However, due to risks associated with radiation exposure, ultrasound is being explored as an alternative to traditional imaging modality. The growing interest in adopting ultrasound as the primary imaging modality during implantation emphasizes the need for practitioners, particularly cardiac electrophysiologists, to be aware of its advantages as well as its limitations. This article discusses the existing and possible future uses of ultrasound in CIED implantation, explores new US-based technologies that could support its usage, and discusses the potential drawbacks associated with it. Additionally, it offers recommendations for enhancing the proficiency of ultrasound-guided implantation and mitigating its limitations. SUMMARY: Question: What is the scope of use of ultrasound in cardiac device implantation?
findingsStudies show that ultrasound is safe for vascular access to reduce complications; aid in lead implantation on the ventricular septum, preventing cardiac perforation; and adjust slack to prevent lead-related tricuspid regurgitation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The clinical relevance of these findings is to help physicians utilize ultrasound during routine cardiac device implantation to enhance clinical outcomes and minimize complications, especially in the era of left bundle branch area pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.