Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020527›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

Technical tips and tricks for complex biplanar high tibial osteotomies.

Tyler M Hauer, Romed P Vieider, David Wasserstein, Matthieu Ollivier, Volker Musahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A simple planning tool for tibial slope osteotomy-Osteotomy depth is a precise parameter to determine wedge height.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Technical tips and tricks for complex biplanar high tibial osteotomies.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tyler M HauerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-6964
Romed P VieiderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-8403
David WassersteinSchatzker Joint Preservation Initiative - Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-0481
Matthieu OllivierAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Inst Movement Sci, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7025-2776
Volker MusahlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8881-6212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile traditional high tibial osteotomy (HTO) techniques primarily address malalignment in the coronal plane, the significance of sagittal plane alignment, particularly the posterior tibial slope (PTS), is not to be overlooked in the setting of cruciate ligament insufficiency. Combined deformities involving both the coronal plane and the sagittal plane are less common and present unique surgical challenges. This narrative review summarizes the literature and introduces tips and tricks for managing complex biplanar deformities through a case-based discussion of different techniques.

methodsThis narrative review includes preoperative planning, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes and illustrative clinical cases detailing surgical rationale and technical nuances in the correction of biplanar proximal tibial deformities. Emphasis is placed on the importance of accurate assessment and correction of biplanar deformities to optimize patient outcomes. Four representative technique presentations are included: (1) Hybrid HTO with a posterior opening wedge (POW) and anterior closing wedge (ACW), (2) asymmetrical medial closing wedge (MCW) HTO, (3) medial opening wedge (MOW) HTO with an anterolateral hinge and (4) a double HTO with both an infratuberosity ACW and high MOW.

conclusionBiplanar HTO is a knee-preserving surgical option for a small cohort of patients with complex knee deformities involving both the coronal and sagittal planes. Precise preoperative planning and meticulous surgical execution are essential to address these biplanar malalignments effectively. This narrative review serves as a guide for orthopaedic surgeons, highlighting key considerations when planning biplanar HTO and serves as a practical guide for complex cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Knee JointOsteotomyTibiaFemaleHumansMalehigh tibial osteotomykneemedial opening wedgeosteoarthritisosteotomyposterior tibial slope

Identifiers

PMID41020527
PMCPMC12747653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.