Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020469›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.

Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Nick Smith, Madalina Toma, Michele Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Promoting Family/Friend Involvement in Care Planning in Care Homes: A Qualitative Exploration of the Usefulness and Relevance of an Information Resource.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan TaylorApplied Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-7699
Thais CaprioliDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, UK.
Jacqueline DamantCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Yuri HamashimaPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nick SmithCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Madalina TomaPersonal Social Service Research Unit, School of Social Policy, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Michele PetersApplied Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0076-5981

Funding

The research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, grant number NIHR300099.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adult care homes in England must develop care plans on behalf of their residents and make them available to care providers. There is currently a lack of formal agreement around the key principles that should inform the care planning process.

objectiveThe study aimed to develop a set of key principles for care planning in older adult care homes in England.

methodsWe developed 78 evidence-based items and presented them to a panel of health and social care professionals with experience of care planning. We used two online rounds of Delphi to generate consensus (≥ 75%) on items to include in a set of key principles for care planning.

resultsA set of key principles, comprising 81 items, were developed. One-hundred participants completed Round 1, and 80 participated in Round 2. Three percent (n = 4/78) of the Round 1 statements did not reach agreement. Revisions primarily related to the terminology used, clarification of language and an increased emphasis on care home residents' consent and autonomy. Agreement was achieved on all statements (n = 78/78) in Round 2.

conclusionSubstantial agreement was achieved regarding the document's content. Future research should (a) look to develop a resource for the family and friends of care home residents to enhance their participation in care planning and (b) explore how these principles can be put into practice. REPORTING

methodStudy reporting was guided by the Conducting and REporting of DElphi Studies (CREDES) framework. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two public involvement advisers with lived experience of caring for a relative living in a care home worked with researchers to develop the key principles and Delphi survey, recruit panel members, interpret the results from the two rounds and assist with revising the items.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesPatient Care PlanningAgedConsensusDelphi TechniqueEnglandFemaleHumansMaleadvance care planningcare homecare planningDelphi surveynursing homeolder adults

Identifiers

PMID41020469
PMCPMC12477624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.