ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026
Establishment of an inferior vena cava filter retrieval program: the effect on trauma and non-trauma patient populations.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare the effect of establishing an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval program (IVCFRP) on the IVCF retrieval rates in trauma and non-trauma patients.
methodsThis was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. IVCF retrieval in trauma and non-trauma patients was compared before and after the establishment of an IVCFRP in a single Level I Trauma Center. The IVCFRP at our institution was established in April 2020. All patients who underwent IVCF placement between January 2016 and March 2020 were compared with patients who had an IVCF placed between April 2020 and June 2024. A medical record review included the collection of demographic information, indication for IVCF insertion and retrieval, date of IVCF insertion and retrieval, IVCF retrieval rate, clinical outcomes, and complications. The patients were stratified into trauma and non-trauma groups. Univariate analyses were performed with a
resultsA total of 164 patients underwent IVCF placement between January 2016 and June 2024. Fifty-two IVCFs were implanted before and 112 after the establishment of the IVCFRP. The overall rate of IVCF retrieval was significantly higher following the establishment of an IVCFRP (33.3% vs. 51%,
conclusionIVCF retrieval rates significantly improved after the establishment of an IVCFRP. This increase in IVCF retrieval rate was driven by an increase in filter retrievals in the non-trauma patient population. The rate of IVCF retrieval in trauma patients was not affected by the implementation of an IVCFRP. Special considerations and changes in practice may need to be established to improve IVCF retrieval rates in trauma patients. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Implementation of a structured IVCFRP significantly improved retrieval rates in non-trauma patients but did not yield similar results in trauma patients, highlighting the need for alternative strategies in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.