Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020282›Full record

ArticleIntelligent oncology2025

Assessing Quantitative Performance and Expert Review of Multiple Deep Learning-Based Frameworks for Computed Tomography-based Abdominal Organ Auto-Segmentation.

Udbhav S Ram, Joel A Pogue, Michael Soike, Neil T Pfister, Rojymon Jacob, Carlos E Cardenas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intelligent oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Udbhav S RamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.
Joel A PogueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.
Michael SoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.
Neil T PfisterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.
Rojymon JacobDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.
Carlos E CardenasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States.

Funding

DEEP SOUTH TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMKL2TR003097 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2019 to 2023
$5.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003097NCI NIH HHS L30 CA242657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Segmentation of abdominal organs in computed tomography (CT) images within clinical oncological workflows is crucial for ensuring effective treatment planning and follow-up. However, manually generated segmentations are time-consuming and labor-intensive in addition to being subject to inter-observer variability. Many deep learning (DL) and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) frameworks have emerged as a solution to this challenge and show promise in clinical workflows. Objective: This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of existing AutoML frameworks (Auto3DSeg, nnU-Net) against a state-of-the-art non-AutoML framework, the Shifted Window U-Net Transformer (SwinUNETR). Methods: Each framework was trained on the same 122 training images, taken from the Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation (AMOS) grand challenge. Frameworks were compared using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Surface DSC (sDSC), and 95th Percentile Hausdorff Distances (HD95) on an additional 72 holdout-validation images. The perceived clinical viability of 30 auto-contoured test cases was assessed by three physicians in a blinded evaluation. Results: Comparisons show significantly better performance by AutoML methods. nnU-Net (average DSC: 0.924, average sDSC: 0.938, average HD95: 4.26, median Likert: 4.57), Auto3DSeg (average DSC: 0.902, average sDSC: 0.919, average HD95: 8.76, median Likert: 4.49), and SwinUNETR (average DSC: 0.837, average sDSC: 0.844, average HD95: 13.93). AutoML frameworks were quantitatively preferred (13/13 OARs Conclusion: The findings suggest that AutoML frameworks offer a significant advantage in the segmentation of abdominal organs, and underscores the potential of AutoML methods to enhance the efficiency of oncological workflows.

Indexed as

Auto3DSegAutoMLnnU-NetRadiation OncologySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41020282
PMCPMC12462693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.