ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
How recovery influences community reintegration: perspectives of persons with spinal cord injury and their support persons.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate how perceived recovery influences perspectives on successful community reintegration, from the point of view of persons with spinal cord injury (PWS) and their support persons (SP). Methods: Our mixed methods approach included qualitative interviews conducted with civilians and Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their designated SP at three time points across the first year after SCI: during inpatient rehabilitation, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants with SCI completed measures of independence [Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)] and self-efficacy (Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale) during inpatient rehabilitation and at 12 months postinjury. Data analysis was informed by the Transformative Framework and International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Results: Regarding perceptions of how recovery influences community reintegration, PWS most often reported themes related to slow recovery whereas SPs expressed concerns about psychological impacts on PWS. While some participants were equally satisfied with rate of recovery and rate of community reintegration, several deviated from that expected trajectory. Associations between satisfaction with community reintegration and independence or self-efficacy were variable. Conclusions: Successful community reintegration cannot be predicted solely on clinical measures. Inclusion of perspectives of PWS and their support systems is critical to inform successful societal participation after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.