ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonographic diagnosis of congenital auricular anomalies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of prenatal ultrasound and three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal congenital auricular malformations. Methods: The ultrasonographic features of 14 fetuses diagnosed with auricular malformations at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between May 2019 and May 2024 were retrospectively reviewed, and pregnancy outcomes were followed up. Results: The median gestational age at which congenital auricle deformities were detected by ultrasound was 24 weeks 5 days. Of the 14 cases, 5 had bilateral deformities, 5 had right-sided deformities, and 4 had left-sided deformities. The auricular abnormalities detected included microtia, low set ears, accessory auricles, abnormal ear helix and question mark ear, all of which were confirmed by postnatal follow-up or pathological examination after termination. Ten fetuses underwent three-dimensional ultrasound, which provided additional diagnostic details. Eight fetuses presented with other systemic deformities: three had facial deformities such as micrognathia, nasal bone absence, and facial cleft, while five had additional structure anomalies including diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac anomalies, and polydactyly. Genetic testing was performed in nine cases: one fetus had complete trisomy 18, one had Xp22.31 duplication, and seven had normal results. Six pregnancies were electively terminated, while eight fetuses were carried to term. Among the newborns, four had no significant hearing impairment, four others (three with microtia and one with a question mark ear) had hearing loss and required further reconstructive treatment. Conclusion: Congenital auricular deformities exhibit characteristic ultrasound features, and in most cases, prenatal diagnosis and evaluation can be achieved through ultrasound. This provides valuable information to support clinical decision-making and prenatal counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.