ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
High rate of seroeligibility among
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The genetic etiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the critical role of sarcomeric variants in its pathogenesis are well recognized (1). Among these, loss-of-function variants in the myosin binding protein C gene ( Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of 100 adults (aged 18-65 years) with symptomatic Results: Pre-existing anti-AAV9 NAb were undetectable in 50% of patients. Among those with detectable titers (range: 1:10-1:720), only 16% exceeded 1:40. TAb were undetectable in 53%; titers ranged from 1:10 to 1:65,600. A strong correlation was observed between NAb and TAb titers (r = 0.671, Conclusion: Pre-existing immunity to AAV9 was absent or low in most
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.