ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Safety assessment of gemtuzumab ozogamicin: real-world adverse event analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Pharmacotherapeutic Properties and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To mine adverse drug events (ADEs) following the use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), and to provide references for the safety assessment of clinical drug use. Methods: We obtained reports of adverse events with gemtuzumab ozogamicin as the main suspect from FAERS from within the first quarter of 2004 and the third quarter of 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR), comprehensive standard method (MHRA), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were applied to identify AE signals. Results: A total of 2,065 patients were extracted. Screening for adverse drug events identified 238 positive signals. Among these, febrile neutropenia had the highest number of reports, while liver veno-occlusive disease (VOD) had the strongest signal intensity. Notably, our analysis revealed new high-risk signals, including cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) and increased fibrin degradation products, which were not previously highlighted in FAERS analyses. These findings underscore the need for clinicians to closely monitor patients for these emerging risks, particularly in high-risk populations. Conclusion: By leveraging extensive real-world evidence from FAERS, we detected previously unidentified AEs linked to gemtuzumab ozogamicin via disproportionality analysis. Our results highlight the necessity for clinicians and pharmacists to prioritize the effective handling of this agent's high-risk AEs, enhance its rational use in clinical settings, and safeguard patient pharmacotherapy. The identification of new signals, such as COP and increased fibrin degradation products, underscores the importance of continuous pharmacovigilance and the need to update clinical guidelines to reflect these emerging risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.