ReviewPathology oncology research : POR2025
The value of morphology: osteoclast-like cells in soft tissue tumours.
Review in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Update on Selected Giant Cell-Rich Tumors of Soft Tissue.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognition of unusual histological features can augment and hasten a diagnosis but also stimulate ideas about physiological and pathological cellular interactions. Osteoclasts resorb mineralised tissue and therefore can be found at sites of heterotopic bone formation. However, multinucleated giant cells with morphological features of osteoclasts, so called 'osteoclast-like cells' can also be encountered in a variety of soft tissue tumours unrelated to ossification and calcification. Prompted by the presence of osteoclast-like cells in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma while undertaking our Artificial Intelligence project for classifying sarcoma, we reviewed the English literature for these cells in soft tissue tumours and we found that this was poorly documented, and much was published before the release of the WHO essential diagnostic criteria in 2020. There were numerous single case reports and small series of a broad range of soft tissue tumours with osteoclast-like cells but only a limited number of diagnoses in which these cells were reported recurrently. We provide a comprehensive update of osteoclast-like cells and mineralisation in soft tissue tumours from the literature. We also present real-world incidence of osteoclast-like cells from selected tumour types in our Whole Slide Image (WSI) library of soft tissue tumours. Assessment of WSI from 1100 different patients showed that osteoclast-like cells were relatively common and under-recognised in nodular fasciitis (18.5 of 200), angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (17.5% of 40), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (15% of 261) and epithelioid sarcoma (9% of 68) while they were never encountered in myxofibrosarcoma (0/250) and clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (0/80). Awareness of this phenomenon not only helps shape the differential diagnosis but also can be used to stimulate pathobiological questions and to enhance the performance of AI models for classifying disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.