Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020165›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Acceptance and Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Among Cancer Survivors Seeking Information: A Literature Review.

Prabal Chourasia, Melissa Coffel, Jamie Lynn Conklin, William A Wood, Saif Khairat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring young adult cancer survivors' perspectives on generative AI chatbots for symptom support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabal ChourasiaCarolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Melissa CoffelSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9124-4601
Jamie Lynn ConklinHealth Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-9975
William A WoodLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Saif KhairatCarolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-2946

Funding

Center for Virtual Care Value and Excellence (ViVE). RC2TR004380 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Saif Khairat · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS RC2 TR004380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With artificial intelligence (AI) on the rise in healthcare, we investigated the acceptance and adoption of AI among cancer survivors who are seeking information. We searched 3 databases-PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL for original research studies examining cancer survivors' acceptance and adoption of AI while seeking information. We screened 858 articles, resulting in the inclusion of 12 studies. Cancer survivors' perceived benefits of AI include diagnostic accuracy, improved healthcare access, and reduced healthcare costs. Concerns included the loss of human interaction, data loss, and privacy issues. Adoption and acceptance of AI-based Chatbots and cancer trial search tools were also demonstrated. Regarding the ethical use of AI, cancer survivors shared a desire for data de-identification, disclosure, and transparency. Cancer survivors accepted AI as an adjunct to physicians. Patients demonstrated acceptance and adoption of both AI-based educational tools and search engines. Developing AI models with better explainability and education can improve cancer survivors' acceptance and adoption of AI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerclinician–patient relationshippatient experiencepatient satisfactiontechnologytrust

Identifiers

PMID41020165
PMCPMC12475323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.