Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020163›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Not All PID is an STD: A Patient's Perspective on Dismissal, Delay, and Diagnostic Bias.

Vaishnavi J Patel, Devki Patel, Kedar J Patel, Aakaash Duggal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vaishnavi J PatelDepartment of Population Health, Division of Family Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2839-2344
Devki PatelTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0565-6833
Kedar J PatelThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4028-7179
Aakaash DuggalTexas A&M University Naresh K. Vashisht College of Medicine, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3373-9296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is often clinically associated with sexually transmitted infections, which can overshadow a broader differential diagnosis. This patient perspective explores the emotional and clinical consequences of an emergency department visit where assumptions about sexual activity delayed appropriate treatment and resulted in family conflict. As a college student from a conservative cultural background, I was disbelieved when disclosing that I had never been sexually active, and my worsening condition was attributed to denial rather than medical nuance. This piece underscores the importance of approaching patient narratives with cultural humility and avoiding premature diagnostic closure. Recommendations are made for improving history-taking, provider training, and restoring patient trust.

Indexed as

infectionpatient-centered communicationpatient familypatient perspectivepelvic inflammatory diseasesexually transmitted infectionssupport system

Identifiers

PMID41020163
PMCPMC12461030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.