Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020152›Full record

ArticleJournal of chiropractic humanities2025

Chiropractic identity, role, and future: A secondary analysis of a survey of South African chiropractors.

Sharné Naidoo, Savannah Lynn Mitchell, Glen James Paton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chiropractic humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharné NaidooDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Savannah Lynn MitchellDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Glen James PatonDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to evaluate perceptions of South African chiropractors on concepts related to the identity, role, and future of the profession. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative secondary analysis was conducted by inviting South African chiropractors (n=909) to participate in a modified anonymous online survey. Frequency, descriptive, reliability and correlational analyses were performed. Results: An 18.7% response rate was achieved (n=170). Most respondents were aged 25-34 (48.8%), female (61.2%), practicing in Gauteng (44.1%), and graduates of the University of Johannesburg (47.6%). The majority completed a course in evidence-based practice (71.2%) and had less than 5 years of clinical experience (40%). Respondents agreed (94,1%) that chiropractors should be educated in evidence-based practice. A majority of respondents perceived the role of chiropractic in the diagnosis (54.7%) and treatment (70%) of spinal conditions using spinal manipulation and other modalities. There was over 50% agreement among respondents for a unified identity focusing on wellness, health, and preventative care for the future of the profession. Positive correlations were found between the identity, the scope of practice (role), and the future of chiropractic. Conclusion: This sample of South African chiropractors perceived chiropractic practitioners to be spinal healthcare providers who use evidence-based practices, and that the future of the profession should include promoting overall health and patient wellness.

Indexed as

ChiropracticCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based PracticeScope of Practice

Identifiers

PMID41020152
PMCPMC12464606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.