Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020150›Full record

ArticleJournal of chiropractic humanities2025

Musculoskeletal pain among South African flight Attendants: A cross-sectional study.

Sonia P Narotam, Alexis Harerimana, Julian D Pillay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chiropractic humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonia P NarotamMasters degree, Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
Alexis HarerimanaDoctor of Philosophy, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
Julian D PillayDoctor of Philosophy, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide details on injuries and musculoskeletal pain among South African flight attendants and to explore their knowledge, perception, and utilization of chiropractic care. Methods: The study employed a descriptive, cross-sectional design and used a survey for data collection. A total of 108 participants completed the questionnaire from April to November 2022. Data were analyzed descriptively using frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations. Mann- Whitney U tests compared 5-point Likert scale responses regarding chiropractic perceptions between users and non-users. Findings: The study found that 58% of flight attendants experienced work-related musculoskeletal pain, mainly in the lower back (84.1%) and shoulders (39.7%). Common causes included long shifts (66.7%) and lifting luggage (44.4%). About 32% sought chiropractic care, which 90% found beneficial for both prevention and maintenance. Chiropractic utilization was higher among participants with musculoskeletal pain (41.3%) compared to those without (19.0%, Conclusion: Despite a significant number of flight attendants reporting work-related musculoskeletal pain, their limited knowledge of chiropractic influenced their perception and usage of the service. There is a need for the aviation industry to address musculoskeletal risks and provide adequate chiropractic education and care to flight attendants.

Indexed as

Aviationchiropracticmusculoskeletal painoccupational healthpainSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41020150
PMCPMC12464604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.