ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Digital back-feeding and the mental health of rural older adults: mediation of basic psychological need satisfaction.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to explore the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction in the relationship between digital back-feeding and mental health (specifically depression and loneliness) in rural older adults. The objective is to examine how different forms of digital back-feeding influence mental health by enhancing the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. Methods: This study employed a multistage stratified sampling method, in which 1,663 valid survey responses were collected online. Depression and loneliness in older adults were measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale and UCLA Loneliness Scale-6, respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for in the analysis. Results: Digital access, skills, and literacy were identified as significant negative predictors of depression and loneliness among older adults in rural areas, with basic psychological need satisfaction serving as a key mediator in this relationship. The adverse effects of digital access on depression and loneliness were especially pronounced among men, residents of lower-GDP regions, and individuals from low-income groups. Conclusion: This study explored the impact of digital back-feeding on the psychological health of older adults in rural areas, with a focus on the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. The results revealed considerable heterogeneity in the effects of digital back-feeding on mental health, with variations across gender, regional economic development, and income levels. Based on these findings, we recommend that policymakers promoting digital empowerment consider these factors to design more targeted and effective intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.