Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020101›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Why things look the way they do: we live in a Cartesian grid of reified concepts.

Guy C Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guy C BrownCambridge Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world we live in now is almost exclusively populated by things designed by minds to be understood by other minds. I argue here that: (1) Human environments now consist mainly of reified concepts, such as "chairs." (2) These externalized concepts look like simple cartoons of the concepts they reify, with flat, homogenous surfaces in geometric shapes, with one or a small number of colors, textures and surfaces, so that they can be easily identified and distinguished. (3) Reified concepts are organized within a Cartesian grid, that enables their perception, location and memory. (4) Simple concepts are nested within complex concepts, such as rooms, houses, streets, hospitals or cities, designed to be read by our minds, and guide behavior, within the externalized mind of society. (5) Components of the human environment that are not conceptual are actively removed, resulting in a very low entropy of information, and giving the illusion that reality is entirely conceptual. (6) Reified concepts and their conceptual ordering help perception, comprehension and use of human environments. (7) These ideas have application to design, architecture, aesthetics, phenomenology, ontology and understanding why things look the way they do.

Indexed as

aestheticsarchitecturedistributed cognitionenvironmental psychologyextended mindphenomenologyphilosophyreified concepts

Identifiers

PMID41020101
PMCPMC12462698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.