Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020099›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Can anticipated regret promote rationality? The influence of anticipated regret on risk aversion and choice satisfaction.

Jing Liu, Haiyan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing LiuSchool of Psychology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China.
Haiyan LiuSchool of Psychology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This research examines the impact of anticipated regret on decision-making under risk, focusing specifically on its role in promoting risk aversion and enhancing choice satisfaction. Methods: Three studies were conducted to systematically investigate the effects of anticipated regret. In Study 1, the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) was used to manipulate the presence or absence of anticipated regret. Study 2 introduced individual differences in risk preference to examine how this trait interacts with anticipated regret in shaping risk-taking behavior. Study 3 added a time pressure condition to explore how anticipated regret functions under varying decision-making constraints. Results: Study 1 showed that anticipated regret significantly increased risk-averse behavior and improved choice satisfaction. In Study 2, both anticipated regret and individual risk preference influenced risk-taking, but only anticipated regret had a consistent positive effect on satisfaction. No significant interaction was found between the two variables. Study 3 revealed that participants were generally more risk-averse under time pressure, and the effect of anticipated regret on risk avoidance was attenuated in high-pressure conditions. However, its positive influence on satisfaction remained stable across conditions. Conclusion: Anticipated regret consistently influenced both risk-taking behavior and choice satisfaction across different individual dispositions and situational conditions, highlighting the stable and significant role of prospective emotions in decision-making under risk.

Indexed as

anticipated regretBalloon Analog Risk Taskchoice satisfactionrisk aversionrisk preferencetime pressure

Identifiers

PMID41020099
PMCPMC12460334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.