Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020079›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medicine and life2025

Non-invasive monitoring solutions in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Madalina Piron-Dumitrascu, Dragos Cretoiu, Valentin Nicolae Varlas, Nicolae Suciu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madalina Piron-DumitrascuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Polizu Clinical Hospital, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Bucharest, Romania.
Dragos CretoiuDepartment of Medical Genetics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Valentin Nicolae VarlasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Nicolae SuciuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Polizu Clinical Hospital, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple, non-invasive, and affordable ambulatory fetal monitoring methods have been integrated into routine prenatal care, with the potential to enhance maternal-fetal health surveillance. Although conventional prenatal care is the basis of pregnancy monitoring, more and more studies are presenting complementary approaches that aim to identify early, potentially pathological changes in fetal status. The use of portable devices, such as a handheld fetal Doppler (for at-home detection of fetal heartbeats) and a pulse oximeter (for maternal heart rate assessment), has been proposed as additional tools in the context of pregnancy monitoring. These devices may influence patients' behavior regarding seeking medical care and using health services. Access to instruments that allow minimal monitoring at home for pregnant women could facilitate the earlier identification of possible changes, especially in situations where access to direct medical consultations is delayed or restricted. The ease of use and availability of these devices in the broader market raise the question of their integration into a standardized prenatal monitoring framework. This study investigated the feasibility and patients' perceptions of using handheld Dopplers during pregnancy. An observational analytical study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2023 at the Polizu Clinical Hospital in Bucharest, involving 1,127 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria (gestational age between 14 and 27 weeks + 6 days and absence of major psychiatric disorders). Of these, 101 women completed a questionnaire regarding fetal monitoring in the second trimester. Responses were analyzed with a focus on the perceived usefulness of the handheld Doppler at home. The majority of participants (79.2%) considered the device helpful, 76.2% reported that it provided them with peace of mind, and 22.8% noted that it led to greater involvement from their partner or family. These findings demonstrate the good acceptability of the tested device, especially among pregnant women in their first pregnancy or with a perceived increased risk, and support the opportunity to integrate this type of monitoring into current obstetric practice. Furthermore, ambulatory and home fetal monitoring solutions provide valuable support in the management of modern pregnancies, but they cannot replace clinical assessment and specialist supervision.

Indexed as

Fetal MonitoringPregnancy Trimester, SecondAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultfetal and maternal surveillancehigh-risk pregnancyneonatal outcomesnon-invasive monitoringsecond trimester of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41020079
PMCPMC12467439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.