ArticleSage open aging
Development and Validation of an App Rating System for Caregiver Financial Management Apps.
Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to develop and evaluate a consumer-centered app rating system designed to guide employed caregivers in the selection of effective and user-friendly apps to manage financial stress. Methods: This study describes the development of a consumer-centered app rating system designed to guide employed caregivers in the selection of effective and user-friendly apps to manage financial stress and its psychometric evaluation using a sample of 100 US adults age 20 to 87 who were recruited from nine organizations through the Exhale respite grant website in February 2024. Results: Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure comprised of user experience and financial management. The 13-item scale was psychometrically sound and demonstrated good internal reliability. Discussion: The development and evaluation of a scale to assess caregiver-specific financial management apps provides practical insights to improve the design of existing financial management apps and better support caregivers in their important and challenging financial role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.