ArticleCureus2025
Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibody Unexpectedly Detected During Recovery Phase in Three Patients With Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Antibody-Related Autoimmune Encephalitis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies are increasingly tested in patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and other neurological diseases, yet their clinical significance, especially when detected outside of classic contexts, remains poorly defined. This case series of three patients explores an unusual pattern of antibody dynamics in VGKC antibody-positive and leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies-negative AE. All patients underwent immunotherapy based on clinical suspicion and improved, and had delayed emergence of GAD antibodies during recovery phases. The key observations were that VGKC antibody levels were elevated during the acute presentation and either declined or normalized following treatment. GAD antibodies were absent during acute illness but emerged during the post-treatment/recovery phase, when patients were already recuperating. No patient developed syndromes classically associated with GAD antibodies (e.g., worsening encephalitis, stiff person syndrome, and refractory seizures). LGI1 and CASPR2 antibodies were consistently negative throughout all tested phases. These findings bring up the questions of the role(s) GAD antibody may play in the disease processes in AE and other neurological diseases, including the possibility of GAD antibody positivity not necessarily indicating active or causative disease, and suggest it may, in some contexts, represent a phenomenon of immune remodeling or non-specific activation. Additionally, these cases reinforce the potential clinical utility of initiating immunotherapy based on phenotype and clinical suspicion, particularly in VGKC-positive, LGI1/CASPR2-negative presentations, while emphasizing the need for more nuanced interpretation of antibody dynamics over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.