ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Attitudes and use of complementary and alternative medicine: a cross-sectional comparison between medical and non-medical students.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge and Use of Herbal Medicine Among Urban Adolescents and Young Adults in Western Mexico: Family Transmission, Social Media Exposure, and Associated Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge of Dietary Supplements and Attitudes Towards Complementary Medicine Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Students are one of the groups in society that use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Given their role in promoting the use of CAM and the potential differences in attitudes due to their educational backgrounds, it is important to investigate their perspectives on CAM. This study aimed to compare the attitudes and use of CAM between medical and non-medical students. The study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted among 525 medical and non-medical students in Iran. Data were collected using a descriptive information form, a CAM questionnaire, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire (HCAMQ). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The mean HCAMQ scores for medical and non-medical students were 33.10 ± 5.39 and 31.96 ± 5.48, respectively. A significant difference was found between medical and non-medical students in terms of their attitudes toward CAM, as measured by the HCAMQ subscale (p = 0.005). Additionally, 72.8% of medical students and 61.0% of non-medical students reported using at least one CAM method. A positive and statistically significant relationship was observed between medical and non-medical students in terms of their overall use of CAM (p = 0.005) and nutritional supplement methods (p = 0.025). Analysis of the reasons for using CAM revealed that only the use of medicinal herbs showed a significant difference between medical and non-medical students (p = 0.002). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of consulting a physician before using CAM methods. Given the significant difference in attitudes toward CAM between medical and non-medical students, it is essential to address the distinct educational needs of these two groups. Developing effective and targeted educational programs could improve their knowledge and promote the safe and informed use of CAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.