Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019970›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Regularized partial correlation provides reliable functional connectivity estimates while correcting for widespread confounding.

Kirsten L Peterson, Ruben Sanchez-Romero, Ravi D Mill, Michael W Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsten L PetersonCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6267-0614
Ruben Sanchez-RomeroCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9297-6371
Ravi D MillCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9249-8744
Michael W ColeCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-438X

Funding

MAPPING THE HUMAN CONNECTOME DURING TYPICAL AGINGU01AG052564 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SALAT, DAVID H, TERPSTRA, MELISSA J · 2016 to 2020
$18.9M
Neural Mechanisms of Transcranial Current StimulationR01NS120289 · NINDS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI KREKELBERG, BART, POLACK, PIERRE- OLIVIER · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG052564NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) has been invaluable for understanding the brain's communication network, with strong potential for enhanced FC approaches to yield additional insights. Unlike with the fMRI field-standard method of pairwise correlation, theory suggests that partial correlation can estimate FC without confounded and indirect connections. However, partial correlation FC can also display low repeat reliability, impairing the accuracy of individual estimates. We hypothesized that reliability would be increased by adding regularization, which can reduce overfitting to noise in regression-based approaches like partial correlation. We therefore tested several regularized alternatives-graphical lasso, graphical ridge, and principal component regression-against unregularized partial and pairwise correlation, applying them to empirical resting-state fMRI and simulated data. As hypothesized, regularization vastly improved reliability, quantified using between-session similarity and intraclass correlation. This enhanced reliability then granted substantially more accurate individual FC estimates when validated against structural connectivity (empirical data) and ground truth networks (simulations). Graphical lasso showed especially high accuracy among regularized approaches, seemingly by maintaining more valid underlying network structures. We additionally found graphical lasso to be robust to noise levels, data quantity, and subject motion-common fMRI error sources. Lastly, we demonstrated that resting-state graphical lasso FC can effectively predict fMRI task activations and individual differences in behavior, further establishing its reliability, external validity, and ability to characterize task-related functionality. We recommend graphical lasso or similar regularized methods for calculating FC, as they can yield more valid estimates of unconfounded connectivity than field-standard pairwise correlation, while overcoming the poor reliability of unregularized partial correlation.

Indexed as

diffusion MRIfMRIindividual differencesnetwork neuroscienceregularizationstructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID41019970
PMCPMC12461088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.