ArticleRadiology case reports2025
Coronary stenting after aortic root replacement.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posterior Teflon-Felt-Reinforced Coronary Button Anastomosis in a Modified Bentall Procedure: Early Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a case of severe coronary artery stenosis in a 29-year-old male 1 month after aortic root replacement (ARR). The patient presented with exertional chest pain that progressed to prolonged resting angina and ventricular arrhythmia. Electrocardiography showed ischemic changes suggestive of left coronary artery involvement, and multislice computed tomography angiography confirmed subtotal stenosis at the left main (LM) bifurcation. Urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent implantation from the LM to the left anterior descending artery was performed using a provisional technique, resulting in improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction from 23% to 55%. The patient was discharged without complications and remained event-free at 6-month follow-up. This case highlights a rare but potentially life-threatening coronary complication after ARR, which may be related to perfusion cannula placement, technical factors during coronary ostial reimplantation, or proliferative reactions to the aortic prosthesis or gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue. It underscores the need for early recognition and vigilance for coronary ischemia after ARR - even in young patients without prior coronary artery disease - and emphasizes the efficacy of emergency PCI. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to optimize outcomes in complex postsurgical cardiovascular patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.