ArticleEuropean oral research2025
The influence of toluidine blue staining on decision-making for the selection of biopsy sites in oral disorders.
Article in European oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Current Trends in Diagnosis and Early Monitoring of Oral Cavity Cancer: Techniques and Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of toluidine blue (TB) staining on decision-making processes for the identification of biopsy sites in oral lesions. Materials and methods: Original and TB-stained images of oral mucosal lesions that required histopathological examination were accessed through archives. Twenty dental specialists were asked to select and mark their choice of biopsy sites on both original and TB-stained images using a standard circle selection tool of software. The X and Y coordinates of the center points of selections were calculated by a custom-made image processing algorithm in Matlab. In order to assess the dispersity of the selected centers from the mean center, the distances of the selected points from this average point were calculated using Euclidean distance. Data was analysed using Wilcoxon test. Results: The study involved original and TB-stained images of 5 suspicious lesions. The histological diagnoses of oral lesions were reported as bening for 3 cases and malignant for 2 cases. 20 dental specialists marked their choice of biopsy site on a total of 200 images. The results revealed that the biopsy selections varied significantly between original and TB-stained images in certain cases. In 60% of cases, specialists showed statistically significant agreement in biopsy site selection on TB-stained images compared to original images (p <0.05). Conclusion: While the study did not evaluate the accuracy of site selection against a gold standard, the observed consensus among specialists suggests the potential utility of TB staining in enhancing the consistency and objectivity of biopsy site selection for suspicious oral lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.