Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019927›Full record

ArticleEuropean oral research2025

Effect of light guide tip diameter on the degree of conversion and depth of cure of bulk-fill composites.

Zeynep Hale Keles, Berna Tarim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zeynep Hale KelesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Berna TarimDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Nişantaşı University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the light guide tip diameter on the degree of conversion, micro-hardness, and depth of cure of bulk-fill composites compared to a conventional composite. Materials and methods: Layers of Tetric EvoCeram (2 mm), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (4 mm), SonicFill 2 (5 mm) were placed in 4 mm diameter molds and were cured with LED light curing unit having 13/8 or 13/4 mm diameter turbo light guide tips for 10 s with a total number of 60 samples (n=5). Then, specimens were stored in a dark and dry environmentat 37°C for 24 h, and Vickers micro-hardness values of the top and bottom surfaces of 30 specimens were measured. The other 30 specimens were pulverized, andthe degree of conversion values of the specimens was measured with FTIR-ATR.The depth of cure was determined by proportioning the bottom surface's micro-hardness value to the top surfaces. Data were analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilks test, Student's t-test, and Pearson's correlation analysis (p < 0.05). Results: The degree of conversion and the depth of cure of bulk-fill composites cured with 13/8 mm diameter tip were higher than those cured with 13/4 mm diameter tip (p<0.01). The degree of conversion of the bulk-fill composites applied in the layer thickness recommended by the manufacturer was below the clinically accepted rate of 55%, and the depth of cure remained below 80%. Conclusion: The curing of bulk-fill composites with light guide tips of different diameters affects the degree of conversion and the depth of the cure.

Indexed as

degree of conversiondepth of curelight-guide tip diametermicro-hardnessnasal septum

Identifiers

PMID41019927
PMCPMC12463319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.