ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Venous-Only Approach for Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Infants: Is It Time for Change?
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The standard approach for transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus (TC-PDA) requires arterial access and is associated with the risk of arterial injury, a metric tracked by national quality improvement registries. Venous-only TC-PDA in premature infants is performed successfully without arterial access. It was hypothesized that PDA closure in infants could be performed safely and effectively without arterial access. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. All infants weighing 2 to 10 kg who underwent TC-PDA closure between January 2019 and December 2024 were included in the study. Patients who underwent concurrent procedures and those with complex heart disease were excluded from the study. TC-PDA was performed using the standard approach or venous-only approach at the discretion of the attending cardiologist. Results: In total, 150 patients underwent TC-PDA: 59 patients (19 male) underwent closure using the standard approach and 91 patients (35 male) using the venous-only approach. There was no difference in the minimum patent ductus arteriosus diameter. There was no pulse loss in the venous-only cohort; 1 patient (1.7%) treated with the standard approach had clinical symptomatic arterial injury requiring therapy. The venous-only cohort was younger, weighed less, and had lower radiation exposure, contrast use, shorter total procedure, and total sheath time. There was no difference in other adverse procedural outcomes. Conclusions: Venous-only approach for TC-PDA closure in infants is as effective and efficient as the standard approach. The added advantage of eliminating arterial injury increases the safety for TC-PDA in small infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.