ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Incidence of Complications Following Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy, Clinical Outcomes, and Predictors of Complications.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Intravascular Coronary Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Single-Center Tertiary Experience From the Middle East.Cureus · 2026Article
- Novel Hertz Contact Intravascular Lithotripsy: Could We Achieve More in Balloon-Based Calcium Modification?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Breaking Down the Risk During Intravascular Lithotripsy: Is It the Lesion, the Lithotripsy, or the Lack of Intravascular Imaging?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications associated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) therapy, assess clinical outcomes, and identify predictors of complications in a real-world patient cohort. Methods: Patients undergoing IVL between May 2019 and September 2024 were enrolled from the BENELUX-IVL registry and categorized based on the occurrence of complications following IVL and concomitant therapy. End points were achievement of residual diameter stenosis <30% on quantitative coronary analysis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to compare outcomes and to identify predictors of complications. Results: The study included 509 patients (73 ± 9 years, 75% male). Complications occurred in 33 patients (6%), of which 6 complications occurred immediately after IVL (1%). The most frequent complications were flow-limiting coronary dissections (n = 9, 2%), hemodynamic instability (n = 9, 2%), and coronary perforations (n = 7, 1%). These were effectively managed with 30 interventions, resulting in favorable procedural outcomes. Among patients with complications and available quantitative coronary analysis data, residual diameter stenosis <30% was achieved in 28 of 29 lesions (97%). One-year cumulative MACE was 11% (39 patients) and was significantly higher in patients with complications ( Conclusions: In this real-world registry, complications following IVL and concomitant therapy were infrequent. Patients with procedural complications had significantly higher 1-year MACE, primarily driven by in-hospital events. Larger predilatation balloon diameters were a significant predictor of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.