ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
East Meets West: A Multisite Validity Study of the China Medical Professionalism Inventory.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to evaluate the professional behavior of medical residents.PloS one · 2026Article
- Perceptions, attitudes and behaviors regarding professionalism and their relationships reported by newly enrolled Chinese residents.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The characteristics of medical professionalism (MP) vary across cultural contexts. Professionalism constructs and MP tools currently rely on Western cultural perspectives. Chinese leaders are calling for MP tools that connect to historical traditions, current culture, and modern conceptualizations of MP inside and outside China. Methods: The authors developed the China Medical Professionalism Inventory using standard processes in two steps. Phase I, "development of item pool," involved reviewing the literature to generate an item pool and conducting a first survey of Chinese clinical experts to develop content evidence. Phase II, "delineation of validity evidence," included three psychometric studies of practicing physicians and a second expert survey to create the final version of the tool; these processes aimed to determine validity evidence for content, internal structure, and relationships to other variables. Results: Systematic review of the English- and Chinese-language literature identified 1537 professionalism-specific items from 63 sources to form the item pool. The authors conducted two rounds of expert review, including surveying nationally prominent Chinese clinician-leaders (n = 34, response rate 85%, and n = 76, response rate 63%). The authors conducted three psychometric studies of practicing Chinese physicians (n = 360, response rate 92%; n = 3653, response rate 90%; and n = 955, response rate 95%). The results generated the 20-item CMPI, with four factors: "Respect, Compassion, and Communication; Integrity; Excellence; and Responsibility." Discussion: The CMPI presented validity evidence for content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables. This study may extend the conceptualization and reach of MP measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.