Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019845›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

East Meets West: A Multisite Validity Study of the China Medical Professionalism Inventory.

Honghe Li, David A Hirsh, Xinzhi Song, Edward Krupat, Xue Yang, Ming-Jung Ho, Dianne Manning, Deliang Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Honghe LiInstitute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, School of Medical Humanities, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-6147
David A HirshDepartment of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts and Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-4047
Xinzhi SongInstitute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2155-6465
Edward KrupatCenter for Evaluation (retired), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-0132
Xue YangInstitute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8849-5451
Ming-Jung HoFoundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-8282
Dianne ManningFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7011-1468
Deliang WenInstitute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4038-3849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The characteristics of medical professionalism (MP) vary across cultural contexts. Professionalism constructs and MP tools currently rely on Western cultural perspectives. Chinese leaders are calling for MP tools that connect to historical traditions, current culture, and modern conceptualizations of MP inside and outside China. Methods: The authors developed the China Medical Professionalism Inventory using standard processes in two steps. Phase I, "development of item pool," involved reviewing the literature to generate an item pool and conducting a first survey of Chinese clinical experts to develop content evidence. Phase II, "delineation of validity evidence," included three psychometric studies of practicing physicians and a second expert survey to create the final version of the tool; these processes aimed to determine validity evidence for content, internal structure, and relationships to other variables. Results: Systematic review of the English- and Chinese-language literature identified 1537 professionalism-specific items from 63 sources to form the item pool. The authors conducted two rounds of expert review, including surveying nationally prominent Chinese clinician-leaders (n = 34, response rate 85%, and n = 76, response rate 63%). The authors conducted three psychometric studies of practicing Chinese physicians (n = 360, response rate 92%; n = 3653, response rate 90%; and n = 955, response rate 95%). The results generated the 20-item CMPI, with four factors: "Respect, Compassion, and Communication; Integrity; Excellence; and Responsibility." Discussion: The CMPI presented validity evidence for content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables. This study may extend the conceptualization and reach of MP measurement.

Indexed as

PhysiciansProfessionalismPsychometricsAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41019845
PMCPMC12466328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.